Independent judgment for startup CEOs

Get a second opinion.Before you commit.

id0 helps startup CEOs pressure-test consequential decisions where technology, product, security, team, and business overlap.

Pressure-test the recommendation before you spend months, make a senior hire, or put a customer deal at risk.

Talk through a decision 20-minute fit call · no charge
When id0 gets pulled in

Usually, someone smart already has a strong recommendation. You need to know what they may be missing before you say yes.

01
Security

“Enterprise deals keep getting blocked on security.”

Revenue at riskSecurity / pipeline
02
Architecture

“Engineering wants to rewrite the platform. Is it actually necessary?”

6+ months of engineeringArchitecture / roadmap
03
AI / Product

“Should we build this AI capability, buy it, or not build it yet?”

Product + capital betBuild / buy / wait
04
Team / Operating

“Do we need another senior technical leader, or a better way of operating?”

Executive-level decisionTeam / operating model
Works across

Defense

Classified and compliance-adjacent security calls.

Energy

OT and critical infrastructure risk.

Manufacturing

Supply chain and vendor risk.

Finance

Vendor and platform risk review.

The goal is the right decision. Not a bigger engagement.

Some questions end in one call. Others turn into deeper work. Either way, the work starts with the decision in front of you.

The output

A clear call, not a deck.

See the recommendation, the assumptions behind it, and the next move — without paying for a 40-page deck.

Decision reviewSecurity · worked example
The decision

What do we actually need to fix to stop security from blocking enterprise deals?

Sales is losing momentum in security reviews. Engineering thinks customer requirements are excessive. The question is how much security investment the pipeline actually justifies.

The read
Don't build the whole security program.
Fix what's actually blocking revenue first.
The dealsWhat specifically caused the last several security reviews to stall?
The gapsWhich requirements are real blockers versus procurement boilerplate?
The responseDoes this require technology, process, ownership, a senior hire, or some combination?
20+ yearsOperating across security, infrastructure, product, and company building.
DirectYou work with the operator doing the thinking. No analyst or coordinator handoff.
Decision firstOne session, follow-on work, or ongoing advisory. Scope follows the problem.
How you engage
20 50

Twenty minutes to see if the question is a fit. Fifty minutes to pressure-test it and make the call. Deeper work only when the problem actually requires it.

20minutes

Fit call

Bring the decision. We establish the real question, the business context, and whether id0 is the right place to help.

$0No obligation
50minutes

Working session

Pressure-test the recommendation, expose the tradeoffs, and leave with a clear call and next move.

$999Fixed fee
if needed

Deeper work / advisory

For diligence, operating questions, or ongoing advisory that cannot be handled responsibly in one session. Scope is agreed before work begins.

ScopedAgreed first

What decision are you about to make?

Talk it through